| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition vs Xeon E5-2670 v3


Description
The 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2 architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets a score of 327.7 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
306f2
Core
Renoir
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/24
TDP
15 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
30720 kB
Date
April 2021
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
55.74k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
327.72k points
452.9k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
15.5k
18.62k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
22.96k
10.49k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.78k
4.04k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.5k
3.26k (x0.38)
TOTAL
55.74k
36.41k (x0.65)

Multithread

4680U Microsoft Surface Edition

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
110.78k
236.25k (x2.13)
Test#2 (FP)
149.38k
151.05k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.88k
58.9k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.68k
6.7k (x1)
TOTAL
327.72k
452.9k (x1.38)

Performance/W
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
7386 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9959 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4059 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
445 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
21848 points/W
3774 points/W

Performance/GHz
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3876 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2195 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2125 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
13935 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4