Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition vs Core i9-10900X
Description
The 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets a score of 327.7 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 1.9 times faster than the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets a score of 327.7 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 1.9 times faster than the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
50657
Core
Renoir
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
6/12
10/20
TDP
15 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
10x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
19712 kB
Date
April 2021
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
55.74k points
62.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
327.72k points
632.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.5k
25.97k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
22.96k
22.37k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.78k
5.3k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.5k
8.63k (x1.02)
TOTAL
55.74k
62.28k (x1.12)
Multithread
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
110.78k
281.98k (x2.55)
Test#2 (FP)
149.38k
259.01k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.88k
64.87k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.68k
26.5k (x3.97)
TOTAL
327.72k
632.35k (x1.93)
Performance/W
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
7386 points/W
1709 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9959 points/W
1570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4059 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
445 points/W
161 points/W
TOTAL
21848 points/W
3832 points/W
Performance/GHz
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3876 points/GHz
5526 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
4760 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2195 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2125 points/GHz
1835 points/GHz
TOTAL
13935 points/GHz
13250 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4