| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition vs Core i7-10750H


Description
The 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets a score of 327.7 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.1 times faster than the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
a0652
Core
Renoir
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
55.74k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
327.72k points
349.21k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.5k
29.06k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
22.96k
26.49k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.78k
6.23k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.5k
13.89k (x1.63)
TOTAL
55.74k
75.67k (x1.36)

Multithread

4680U Microsoft Surface Edition

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
110.78k
154.61k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
149.38k
151.34k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.88k
36.33k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.68k
6.93k (x1.04)
TOTAL
327.72k
349.21k (x1.07)

Performance/W
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
7386 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9959 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4059 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
445 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
21848 points/W
7760 points/W

Performance/GHz
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3876 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2195 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2125 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
13935 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4