Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition vs Core i3-9100T
Description
The 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets a score of 327.7 k points while the i3-9100T gets 192.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is 1.7 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets a score of 327.7 k points while the i3-9100T gets 192.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is 1.7 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
906eb
Core
Renoir
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2021
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
55.74k points
60.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
327.72k points
192.88k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.5k
24.89k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
22.96k
21.82k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.78k
4.83k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.5k
8.63k (x1.01)
TOTAL
55.74k
60.16k (x1.08)
Multithread
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
110.78k
89.4k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
149.38k
81.19k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.88k
18.06k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.68k
4.24k (x0.63)
TOTAL
327.72k
192.88k (x0.59)
Performance/W
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
7386 points/W
2554 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9959 points/W
2320 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4059 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
445 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
21848 points/W
5511 points/W
Performance/GHz
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3876 points/GHz
6727 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
5897 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2195 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2125 points/GHz
2331 points/GHz
TOTAL
13935 points/GHz
16260 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4