| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition vs Core i3-10105


Description
The 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets a score of 327.7 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is 1.3 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
a0653
Core
Renoir
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2021
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
55.74k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
327.72k points
253.93k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
15.5k
28.9k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
22.96k
25.85k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.78k
5.88k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.5k
8.29k (x0.97)
TOTAL
55.74k
68.92k (x1.24)

Multithread

4680U Microsoft Surface Edition

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
110.78k
111.69k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
149.38k
110.23k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.88k
28.45k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.68k
3.56k (x0.53)
TOTAL
327.72k
253.93k (x0.77)

Performance/W
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
7386 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9959 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4059 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
445 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
21848 points/W
3907 points/W

Performance/GHz
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
3876 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2195 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2125 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
13935 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4