Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition vs Ryzen 7 3750H
Description
The 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 3750H is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets a score of 327.7 k points while the 3750H gets 175.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is 1.9 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets a score of 327.7 k points while the 3750H gets 175.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is 1.9 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
810f81
Core
Renoir
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2021
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
55.74k points
46.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
327.72k points
175.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.5k
13.72k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
22.96k
22.93k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.78k
4.99k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.5k
5.27k (x0.62)
TOTAL
55.74k
46.91k (x0.84)
Multithread
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
110.78k
50.54k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
149.38k
93.33k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.88k
25.25k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.68k
6.07k (x0.91)
TOTAL
327.72k
175.18k (x0.53)
Performance/W
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
7386 points/W
1444 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9959 points/W
2667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4059 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
445 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
21848 points/W
5005 points/W
Performance/GHz
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3876 points/GHz
3430 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
5733 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2195 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2125 points/GHz
1317 points/GHz
TOTAL
13935 points/GHz
11726 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4