| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition vs Ryzen 7 2700X


Description
The 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets a score of 327.7 k points while the 2700X gets 433.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.3 times faster than the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
800f82
Core
Renoir
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2021
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
55.74k points
65.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
327.72k points
433.19k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.5k
15.61k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
22.96k
26.08k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.78k
5.84k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.5k
18.34k (x2.16)
TOTAL
55.74k
65.87k (x1.18)

Multithread

4680U Microsoft Surface Edition

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
110.78k
123.33k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
149.38k
240.46k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.88k
61.23k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.68k
8.17k (x1.22)
TOTAL
327.72k
433.19k (x1.32)

Performance/W
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
7386 points/W
1175 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9959 points/W
2290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4059 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
445 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
21848 points/W
4126 points/W

Performance/GHz
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3876 points/GHz
3631 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2195 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2125 points/GHz
4266 points/GHz
TOTAL
13935 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4