Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition vs 5600G
Description
The 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 5600G is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets a score of 327.7 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600G is 1.1 times faster than the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets a score of 327.7 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600G is 1.1 times faster than the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
a50f00
Core
Renoir
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2021
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
55.74k points
79.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
327.72k points
345.64k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.5k
22.16k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
22.96k
24.46k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.78k
10.71k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.5k
22.44k (x2.64)
TOTAL
55.74k
79.76k (x1.43)
Multithread
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
110.78k
112.5k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
149.38k
153.92k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.88k
67.75k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.68k
11.47k (x1.72)
TOTAL
327.72k
345.64k (x1.05)
Performance/W
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
7386 points/W
1731 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9959 points/W
2368 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4059 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
445 points/W
177 points/W
TOTAL
21848 points/W
5318 points/W
Performance/GHz
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
3876 points/GHz
5036 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2195 points/GHz
2434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2125 points/GHz
5099 points/GHz
TOTAL
13935 points/GHz
18128 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4