| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition vs 1600


Description
The 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets a score of 327.7 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is 1.2 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
800f11
Core
Renoir
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2021
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
55.74k points
56.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
327.72k points
272.8k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
15.5k
13.67k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
22.96k
22.28k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.78k
4.99k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.5k
15.22k (x1.79)
TOTAL
55.74k
56.16k (x1.01)

Multithread

4680U Microsoft Surface Edition

1600
Test#1 (Integers)
110.78k
81.03k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
149.38k
145.84k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.88k
39.14k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.68k
6.79k (x1.02)
TOTAL
327.72k
272.8k (x0.83)

Performance/W
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
7386 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9959 points/W
2244 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4059 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
445 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
21848 points/W
4197 points/W

Performance/GHz
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
3876 points/GHz
3797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
6189 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2195 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2125 points/GHz
4228 points/GHz
TOTAL
13935 points/GHz
15601 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4