| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition vs N95


Description
The 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2 architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets a score of 327.7 k points while the gets 105.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is 3.1 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
b06e0
Core
Renoir
Gracemont
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2021
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
55.74k points
39.5k points
Mean multithread perf.
327.72k points
105.57k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
15.5k
15.57k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.96k
11.5k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.78k
6.06k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.5k
6.36k (x0.75)
TOTAL
55.74k
39.5k (x0.71)

Multithread

4680U Microsoft Surface Edition

Test#1 (Integers)
110.78k
46.51k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
149.38k
35.31k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.88k
19.27k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.68k
4.49k (x0.67)
TOTAL
327.72k
105.57k (x0.32)

Performance/W
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
7386 points/W
3100 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9959 points/W
2354 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4059 points/W
1285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
445 points/W
299 points/W
TOTAL
21848 points/W
7038 points/W

Performance/GHz
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
3876 points/GHz
4579 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
3382 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2195 points/GHz
1783 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2125 points/GHz
1872 points/GHz
TOTAL
13935 points/GHz
11617 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4