| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition vs N100


Description
The 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2 architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets a score of 327.7 k points while the gets 92.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is 3.5 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
b06e0
Core
Renoir
Alder Lake-N
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2021
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
55.74k points
40.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
327.72k points
92.6k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
15.5k
16.04k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
22.96k
12.17k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.78k
6.25k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.5k
5.74k (x0.67)
TOTAL
55.74k
40.2k (x0.72)

Multithread

4680U Microsoft Surface Edition

Test#1 (Integers)
110.78k
38k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
149.38k
34.92k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.88k
15.89k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.68k
3.79k (x0.57)
TOTAL
327.72k
92.6k (x0.28)

Performance/W
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
7386 points/W
6333 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9959 points/W
5820 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4059 points/W
2649 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
445 points/W
632 points/W
TOTAL
21848 points/W
15433 points/W

Performance/GHz
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
3876 points/GHz
4718 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
3580 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2195 points/GHz
1838 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2125 points/GHz
1687 points/GHz
TOTAL
13935 points/GHz
11824 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4