| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition vs N150


Description
The 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is based on Zen+ architecture while the is based on Gracemont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets a score of 174.2 k points while the gets 112.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is 1.5 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
b06e0
Core
Picasso
Twin Lake
Architecture
Zen+
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2019
January 2025
Mean monothread perf.
45.3k points
36.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
174.19k points
112.69k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
13.77k
14.42k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
22.62k
11.18k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.91k
5.68k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4k
5.25k (x1.31)
TOTAL
45.3k
36.54k (x0.81)

Multithread

3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition

Test#1 (Integers)
50.44k
50.39k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
94k
37.69k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.64k
20.09k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
4.53k (x1.1)
TOTAL
174.19k
112.69k (x0.65)

Performance/W
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
3363 points/W
8398 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6267 points/W
6282 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1710 points/W
3348 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
274 points/W
755 points/W
TOTAL
11613 points/W
18782 points/W

Performance/GHz
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
3722 points/GHz
4006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6113 points/GHz
3106 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1326 points/GHz
1579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1082 points/GHz
1459 points/GHz
TOTAL
12243 points/GHz
10151 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4