Ryzen 5 7520U vs N150
Description
The 7520U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the is based on Gracemont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7520U gets a score of 165.7 k points while the gets 112.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 7520U is 1.5 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7520U gets a score of 165.7 k points while the gets 112.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 7520U is 1.5 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
8a0f00
b06e0
Core
Mendocino
Twin Lake
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA FT6
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2022
January 2025
Mean monothread perf.
40.99k points
36.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
165.71k points
112.69k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7520U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.47k
14.42k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
12.38k
11.18k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.81k
5.68k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.33k
5.25k (x0.99)
TOTAL
40.99k
36.54k (x0.89)
Multithread
7520U
Test#1 (Integers)
72.3k
50.39k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
51.23k
37.69k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
37.33k
20.09k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
4.53k (x0.93)
TOTAL
165.71k
112.69k (x0.68)
Performance/W
7520U
Test#1 (Integers)
4820 points/W
8398 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3415 points/W
6282 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2489 points/W
3348 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
323 points/W
755 points/W
TOTAL
11047 points/W
18782 points/W
Performance/GHz
7520U
Test#1 (Integers)
3597 points/GHz
4006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2880 points/GHz
3106 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1817 points/GHz
1579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1238 points/GHz
1459 points/GHz
TOTAL
9532 points/GHz
10151 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4