| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5625U vs Core i7-10700


Description
The 5625U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-10700 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5625U gets a score of 281.3 k points while the i7-10700 gets 537.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 1.9 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a0655
Core
Barcelo
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16386 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
70.65k points
74.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.26k points
537.73k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5625U
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
18.57k
30.66k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
22.03k
25.64k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.55k
5.98k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.5k
12.25k (x0.6)
TOTAL
70.65k
74.53k (x1.05)

Multithread

5625U

i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
92.92k
240.28k (x2.59)
Test#2 (FP)
128.4k
234.3k (x1.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.82k
56.12k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.13k
7.02k (x1.37)
TOTAL
281.26k
537.73k (x1.91)

Performance/W
5625U
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
6194 points/W
3697 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8560 points/W
3605 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3654 points/W
863 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
18750 points/W
8273 points/W

Performance/GHz
5625U
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
4318 points/GHz
6388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5124 points/GHz
5341 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2221 points/GHz
1245 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4768 points/GHz
2553 points/GHz
TOTAL
16431 points/GHz
15527 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4