| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5625U vs Core i5-8265U


Description
The 5625U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5625U gets a score of 281.3 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 5625U is 1.9 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
806eb
Core
Barcelo
Whiskey Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2022
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
70.65k points
57.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.26k points
149.48k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5625U
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.57k
24.32k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
22.03k
20.35k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.55k
4.38k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.5k
8.52k (x0.42)
TOTAL
70.65k
57.57k (x0.81)

Multithread

5625U

i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
92.92k
65.17k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
128.4k
63.6k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.82k
14.4k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.13k
6.31k (x1.23)
TOTAL
281.26k
149.48k (x0.53)

Performance/W
5625U
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
6194 points/W
4345 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8560 points/W
4240 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3654 points/W
960 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
18750 points/W
9965 points/W

Performance/GHz
5625U
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
4318 points/GHz
6235 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5124 points/GHz
5219 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2221 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4768 points/GHz
2183 points/GHz
TOTAL
16431 points/GHz
14762 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4