Ryzen 5 5625U vs Core i5-10400T
Description
The 5625U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5625U gets a score of 281.3 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.1 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5625U gets a score of 281.3 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.1 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a0653
Core
Barcelo
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
70.65k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.26k points
307.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5625U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
18.57k
22k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
22.03k
19.98k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.55k
4.57k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.5k
11.31k (x0.55)
TOTAL
70.65k
57.85k (x0.82)
Multithread
5625U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
92.92k
136.69k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
128.4k
135.25k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.82k
32.76k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.13k
2.48k (x0.48)
TOTAL
281.26k
307.18k (x1.09)
Performance/W
5625U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6194 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8560 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3654 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
18750 points/W
8776 points/W
Performance/GHz
5625U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4318 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5124 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2221 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4768 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
16431 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4