Ryzen 5 5625U vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
Description
The 5625U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 4800HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5625U gets a score of 281.3 k points while the 4800HS gets 427.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1.5 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5625U gets a score of 281.3 k points while the 4800HS gets 427.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1.5 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
860f01
Core
Barcelo
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2022
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
70.65k points
61.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.26k points
427.61k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5625U
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
18.57k
16.66k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
22.03k
26.01k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.55k
9.31k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.5k
9.15k (x0.45)
TOTAL
70.65k
61.12k (x0.87)
Multithread
5625U
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
92.92k
144.48k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
128.4k
192.46k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.82k
83.17k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.13k
7.51k (x1.46)
TOTAL
281.26k
427.61k (x1.52)
Performance/W
5625U
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6194 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8560 points/W
5499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3654 points/W
2376 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
18750 points/W
12218 points/W
Performance/GHz
5625U
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
4318 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5124 points/GHz
6194 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2221 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4768 points/GHz
2177 points/GHz
TOTAL
16431 points/GHz
14553 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4