| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5625U vs 5600G


Description
Both models 5625U and 5600G are based on Zen 3 architecture.

Zen 3 uses TSMC’s 7nm process, still uses the AM4 socket and has up yo 32MB of L3 cache per CCX.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5625U gets a score of 281.3 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600G is 1.2 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a50f00
Core
Barcelo
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
70.65k points
79.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.26k points
345.64k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5625U
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
18.57k
22.16k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
22.03k
24.46k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.55k
10.71k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.5k
22.44k (x1.09)
TOTAL
70.65k
79.76k (x1.13)

Multithread

5625U

5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
92.92k
112.5k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
128.4k
153.92k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.82k
67.75k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.13k
11.47k (x2.24)
TOTAL
281.26k
345.64k (x1.23)

Performance/W
5625U
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
6194 points/W
1731 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8560 points/W
2368 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3654 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/W
177 points/W
TOTAL
18750 points/W
5318 points/W

Performance/GHz
5625U
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
4318 points/GHz
5036 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5124 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2221 points/GHz
2434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4768 points/GHz
5099 points/GHz
TOTAL
16431 points/GHz
18128 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4