| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5625U vs 2600X


Description
The 5625U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5625U gets a score of 281.3 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.2 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
800f82
Core
Barcelo
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
70.65k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.26k points
333.12k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5625U
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
18.57k
15.75k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
22.03k
26.29k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.55k
5.91k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.5k
18.48k (x0.9)
TOTAL
70.65k
66.44k (x0.94)

Multithread

5625U

2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
92.92k
94.49k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
128.4k
182.53k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.82k
45.95k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.13k
10.15k (x1.98)
TOTAL
281.26k
333.12k (x1.18)

Performance/W
5625U
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6194 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8560 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3654 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
18750 points/W
3507 points/W

Performance/GHz
5625U
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4318 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5124 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2221 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4768 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
16431 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4