| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5625U vs Ryzen 3 3250U


Description
The 5625U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5625U gets a score of 281.3 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5625U is 3.6 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
810f81
Core
Barcelo
Dali
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
70.65k points
33.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.26k points
77.88k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5625U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.57k
9.33k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
22.03k
17.1k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.55k
3.57k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.5k
3.26k (x0.16)
TOTAL
70.65k
33.26k (x0.47)

Multithread

5625U

3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
92.92k
22.14k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
128.4k
40.04k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.82k
10.71k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.13k
5k (x0.97)
TOTAL
281.26k
77.88k (x0.28)

Performance/W
5625U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
6194 points/W
1476 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8560 points/W
2669 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3654 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
18750 points/W
5192 points/W

Performance/GHz
5625U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
4318 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5124 points/GHz
4886 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2221 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4768 points/GHz
932 points/GHz
TOTAL
16431 points/GHz
9503 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4