| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5625U vs Core i3-12100F


Description
The 5625U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5625U gets a score of 281.3 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-12100F is 1.2 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
90675
Core
Barcelo
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
15 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+x4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
70.65k points
88.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.26k points
340.49k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5625U
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
18.57k
39.54k (x2.13)
Test#2 (FP)
22.03k
23.79k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.55k
11.96k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.5k
13.52k (x0.66)
TOTAL
70.65k
88.81k (x1.26)

Multithread

5625U

i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
92.92k
148k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
128.4k
123.08k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.82k
52.73k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.13k
16.67k (x3.25)
TOTAL
281.26k
340.49k (x1.21)

Performance/W
5625U
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
6194 points/W
2552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8560 points/W
2122 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3654 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
18750 points/W
5871 points/W

Performance/GHz
5625U
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
4318 points/GHz
9195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5124 points/GHz
5532 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2221 points/GHz
2781 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4768 points/GHz
3144 points/GHz
TOTAL
16431 points/GHz
20652 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4