| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5600X vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The 5600X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600X gets a score of 435.1 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600X is 1.5 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f10
50654
Core
Vermeer
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
11264 kB
Date
November 2020
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
86.03k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
435.05k points
281.48k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600X
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
23.28k
18.78k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
25.58k
16.25k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.72k
3.99k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.45k
6.8k (x0.27)
TOTAL
86.03k
45.82k (x0.53)

Multithread

5600X

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
135.28k
133.55k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
180.56k
108.43k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80.27k
30.02k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.94k
9.48k (x0.24)
TOTAL
435.05k
281.48k (x0.65)

Performance/W
5600X
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
2081 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2778 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1235 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
599 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
6693 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
5600X
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
5061 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5562 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2548 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5533 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
18702 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4