| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5600X vs Ryzen 9 5900HS


Description
Both models 5600X and 5900HS are based on Zen 3 architecture.

Zen 3 uses TSMC’s 7nm process, still uses the AM4 socket and has up yo 32MB of L3 cache per CCX.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600X gets a score of 435.1 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600X is 1 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f10
a50f00
Core
Vermeer
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
16384 kB
Date
November 2020
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
86.03k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
435.05k points
434.96k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600X
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
23.28k
21.2k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
25.58k
25k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.72k
11.44k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.45k
24.22k (x0.95)
TOTAL
86.03k
81.87k (x0.95)

Multithread

5600X

5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
135.28k
145.13k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
180.56k
198.36k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80.27k
85.67k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.94k
5.79k (x0.15)
TOTAL
435.05k
434.96k (x1)

Performance/W
5600X
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2081 points/W
4147 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2778 points/W
5667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1235 points/W
2448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
599 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
6693 points/W
12427 points/W

Performance/GHz
5600X
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
5061 points/GHz
4608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5562 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2548 points/GHz
2488 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5533 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
TOTAL
18702 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4