| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5600X vs Ryzen 7 2700X


Description
The 5600X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600X gets a score of 435.1 k points while the 2700X gets 433.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600X is 1 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f10
800f82
Core
Vermeer
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
16384 kB
Date
November 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
86.03k points
65.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
435.05k points
433.19k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600X
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
23.28k
15.61k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
25.58k
26.08k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.72k
5.84k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.45k
18.34k (x0.72)
TOTAL
86.03k
65.87k (x0.77)

Multithread

5600X

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
135.28k
123.33k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
180.56k
240.46k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80.27k
61.23k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.94k
8.17k (x0.21)
TOTAL
435.05k
433.19k (x1)

Performance/W
5600X
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
2081 points/W
1175 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2778 points/W
2290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1235 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
599 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
6693 points/W
4126 points/W

Performance/GHz
5600X
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5061 points/GHz
3631 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5562 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2548 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5533 points/GHz
4266 points/GHz
TOTAL
18702 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4