| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5600G vs Xeon E5-2670 v3


Description
The 5600G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600G gets a score of 345.6 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.3 times faster than the 5600G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
306f2
Core
Cezanne
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/24
TDP
65 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
30720 kB
Date
April 2021
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
79.76k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
345.64k points
452.9k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600G
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
22.16k
18.62k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
24.46k
10.49k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
4.04k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.44k
3.26k (x0.15)
TOTAL
79.76k
36.41k (x0.46)

Multithread

5600G

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
112.5k
236.25k (x2.1)
Test#2 (FP)
153.92k
151.05k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
67.75k
58.9k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.47k
6.7k (x0.58)
TOTAL
345.64k
452.9k (x1.31)

Performance/W
5600G
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1731 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2368 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1042 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
177 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
3774 points/W

Performance/GHz
5600G
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5036 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5558 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2434 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5099 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
18128 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4