| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5600G vs Xeon E5-2620 v4


Description
The 5600G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600G gets a score of 345.6 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600G is 1.5 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
406f1
Core
Cezanne
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
AM4
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2021
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
79.76k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
345.64k points
237.83k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600G
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
22.16k
12.16k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
24.46k
11.82k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
3.02k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.44k
2.4k (x0.11)
TOTAL
79.76k
29.39k (x0.37)

Multithread

5600G

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
112.5k
103.77k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
153.92k
102.28k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
67.75k
26.13k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.47k
5.65k (x0.49)
TOTAL
345.64k
237.83k (x0.69)

Performance/W
5600G
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1731 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2368 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1042 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
177 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
2798 points/W

Performance/GHz
5600G
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5036 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5558 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2434 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5099 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
18128 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4