| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5600G vs Core i9-9900KF


Description
The 5600G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-9900KF is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600G gets a score of 345.6 k points while the i9-9900KF gets 592.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900KF is 1.7 times faster than the 5600G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
906ed
Core
Cezanne
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16386 kB
Date
April 2021
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
79.76k points
84.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
345.64k points
592.86k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600G
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
22.16k
33.03k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
24.46k
29.52k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
6.55k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.44k
15.45k (x0.69)
TOTAL
79.76k
84.54k (x1.06)

Multithread

5600G

i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
112.5k
276.22k (x2.46)
Test#2 (FP)
153.92k
250.61k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
67.75k
57.2k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.47k
8.84k (x0.77)
TOTAL
345.64k
592.86k (x1.72)

Performance/W
5600G
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
1731 points/W
2908 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2368 points/W
2638 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1042 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
177 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
6241 points/W

Performance/GHz
5600G
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
5036 points/GHz
6605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5558 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2434 points/GHz
1309 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5099 points/GHz
3090 points/GHz
TOTAL
18128 points/GHz
16909 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4