| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5600G vs Core i9-10900KF


Description
The 5600G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600G gets a score of 345.6 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 2.4 times faster than the 5600G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a0655
Core
Cezanne
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
10/20
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
79.76k points
90.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
345.64k points
825.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600G
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
22.16k
35.87k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
24.46k
31.43k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
7.34k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.44k
15.73k (x0.7)
TOTAL
79.76k
90.37k (x1.13)

Multithread

5600G

i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
112.5k
377.56k (x3.36)
Test#2 (FP)
153.92k
347.59k (x2.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
67.75k
88.08k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.47k
12.24k (x1.07)
TOTAL
345.64k
825.47k (x2.39)

Performance/W
5600G
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
1731 points/W
3020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2368 points/W
2781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1042 points/W
705 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
177 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
6604 points/W

Performance/GHz
5600G
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
5036 points/GHz
6898 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5558 points/GHz
6044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2434 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5099 points/GHz
3025 points/GHz
TOTAL
18128 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4