| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5600G vs Core i5-7300HQ


Description
The 5600G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600G gets a score of 345.6 k points while the i5-7300HQ gets 168.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600G is 2 times faster than the i5-7300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
906e9
Core
Cezanne
Kaby Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2021
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
79.76k points
53.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
345.64k points
168.81k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600G
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
22.16k
21.65k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
24.46k
19.18k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
4.38k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.44k
8.3k (x0.37)
TOTAL
79.76k
53.51k (x0.67)

Multithread

5600G

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
112.5k
77.12k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
153.92k
68.68k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
67.75k
15.24k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.47k
7.78k (x0.68)
TOTAL
345.64k
168.81k (x0.49)

Performance/W
5600G
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1731 points/W
1714 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2368 points/W
1526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1042 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
177 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
3751 points/W

Performance/GHz
5600G
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
5036 points/GHz
6186 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5558 points/GHz
5480 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2434 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5099 points/GHz
2372 points/GHz
TOTAL
18128 points/GHz
15289 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4