| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5600G vs Core i3-7130U


Description
The 5600G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-7130U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600G gets a score of 345.6 k points while the i3-7130U gets 90.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600G is 3.8 times faster than the i3-7130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
806e9
Core
Cezanne
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2021
June 2017
Mean monothread perf.
79.76k points
42k points
Mean multithread perf.
345.64k points
90.89k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600G
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.16k
17.82k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
24.46k
16.18k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
3.76k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.44k
4.24k (x0.19)
TOTAL
79.76k
42k (x0.53)

Multithread

5600G

i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
112.5k
40.25k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
153.92k
37.4k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
67.75k
9.07k (x0.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.47k
4.17k (x0.36)
TOTAL
345.64k
90.89k (x0.26)

Performance/W
5600G
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
1731 points/W
2683 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2368 points/W
2493 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1042 points/W
605 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
177 points/W
278 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
6059 points/W

Performance/GHz
5600G
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
5036 points/GHz
6600 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5558 points/GHz
5992 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2434 points/GHz
1391 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5099 points/GHz
1571 points/GHz
TOTAL
18128 points/GHz
15554 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4