| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5600G vs Core i7-11700F


Description
The 5600G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600G gets a score of 345.6 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 1.5 times faster than the 5600G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a0671
Core
Cezanne
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2021
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
79.76k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
345.64k points
512.32k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600G
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
22.16k
32.55k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
24.46k
26.95k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
10.76k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.44k
19.32k (x0.86)
TOTAL
79.76k
89.58k (x1.12)

Multithread

5600G

i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
112.5k
232.06k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
153.92k
203.56k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
67.75k
72.89k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.47k
3.81k (x0.33)
TOTAL
345.64k
512.32k (x1.48)

Performance/W
5600G
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
1731 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2368 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1042 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
177 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
7882 points/W

Performance/GHz
5600G
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
5036 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5558 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2434 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5099 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
18128 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4