| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5600 vs Core i9-9880H


Description
The 5600 is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600 gets a score of 429.2 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600 is 1.1 times faster than the i9-9880H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
906ed
Core
Vermeer
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
16386 kB
Date
March 2022
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
83.79k points
73.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
429.25k points
381.53k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.73k
27.81k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
24.59k
25.88k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
5.65k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.03k
14.19k (x0.57)
TOTAL
83.79k
73.53k (x0.88)

Multithread

5600

i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
134.28k
175.69k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
178.56k
166.56k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
78.16k
35.04k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.26k
4.23k (x0.11)
TOTAL
429.25k
381.53k (x0.89)

Performance/W
5600
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
2066 points/W
3904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2747 points/W
3701 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1202 points/W
779 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
589 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
6604 points/W
8478 points/W

Performance/GHz
5600
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
5166 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5392 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2599 points/GHz
1178 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5688 points/GHz
2956 points/GHz
TOTAL
19043 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4