Ryzen 5 5600 vs Core i5-11400F
Description
The 5600 is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600 gets a score of 429.2 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.2 times faster than the 5600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600 gets a score of 429.2 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.2 times faster than the 5600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
a0671
Core
Vermeer
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2022
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
83.79k points
88.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
429.25k points
495.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
22.73k
31.66k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
24.59k
26.21k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
11.96k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.03k
18.5k (x0.74)
TOTAL
83.79k
88.34k (x1.05)
Multithread
5600
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
134.28k
210.36k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
178.56k
203.84k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
78.16k
72.05k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.26k
9.4k (x0.25)
TOTAL
429.25k
495.65k (x1.15)
Performance/W
5600
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2066 points/W
3236 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2747 points/W
3136 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1202 points/W
1108 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
589 points/W
145 points/W
TOTAL
6604 points/W
7625 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5166 points/GHz
7196 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2599 points/GHz
2718 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5688 points/GHz
4205 points/GHz
TOTAL
19043 points/GHz
20076 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4