Ryzen 5 5500U vs Core i9-9900K
Description
The 5500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500U gets a score of 261.9 k points while the i9-9900K gets 545.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 2.1 times faster than the 5500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500U gets a score of 261.9 k points while the i9-9900K gets 545.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 2.1 times faster than the 5500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f81
906ec
Core
Lucienne
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2021
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
53.76k points
86.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
261.91k points
545.3k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5500U
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.63k
33.62k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
23k
30.02k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.62k
7.17k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.51k
15.43k (x2.37)
TOTAL
53.76k
86.24k (x1.6)
Multithread
5500U
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
90.38k
248.93k (x2.75)
Test#2 (FP)
118.74k
224.43k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.39k
53.39k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
18.54k (x4.21)
TOTAL
261.91k
545.3k (x2.08)
Performance/W
5500U
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6025 points/W
2620 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7916 points/W
2362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3226 points/W
562 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
294 points/W
195 points/W
TOTAL
17461 points/W
5740 points/W
Performance/GHz
5500U
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3908 points/GHz
6724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5750 points/GHz
6003 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2156 points/GHz
1434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1628 points/GHz
3087 points/GHz
TOTAL
13441 points/GHz
17247 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4