| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5500U vs Core i7-6900K


Description
The 5500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-6900K is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500U gets a score of 261.9 k points while the i7-6900K gets 427.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6900K is 1.6 times faster than the 5500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f81
406f1
Core
Lucienne
Broadwell-E
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
15 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
March 2021
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
53.76k points
49.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
261.91k points
427.51k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5500U
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.63k
23.11k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
23k
17.84k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.62k
5.34k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.51k
3.47k (x0.53)
TOTAL
53.76k
49.76k (x0.93)

Multithread

5500U

i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
90.38k
184.19k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
118.74k
181.2k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.39k
47.44k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
14.69k (x3.34)
TOTAL
261.91k
427.51k (x1.63)

Performance/W
5500U
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6025 points/W
1316 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7916 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3226 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
294 points/W
105 points/W
TOTAL
17461 points/W
3054 points/W

Performance/GHz
5500U
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3908 points/GHz
6247 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5750 points/GHz
4822 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2156 points/GHz
1444 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1628 points/GHz
938 points/GHz
TOTAL
13441 points/GHz
13450 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4