| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5500U vs Core i5-8265U


Description
The 5500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500U gets a score of 261.9 k points while the i5-8265U gets 143.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 5500U is 1.8 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f81
806ec
Core
Lucienne
Whiskey Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2021
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
53.76k points
46.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
261.91k points
143.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5500U
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.63k
19.19k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
23k
17.47k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.62k
4.04k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.51k
5.97k (x0.92)
TOTAL
53.76k
46.67k (x0.87)

Multithread

5500U

i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
90.38k
64.43k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
118.74k
61.91k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.39k
13.36k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
3.52k (x0.8)
TOTAL
261.91k
143.23k (x0.55)

Performance/W
5500U
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
6025 points/W
4296 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7916 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3226 points/W
890 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
294 points/W
235 points/W
TOTAL
17461 points/W
9548 points/W

Performance/GHz
5500U
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
3908 points/GHz
4920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5750 points/GHz
4478 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2156 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1628 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
13441 points/GHz
11966 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4