Ryzen 5 5500U vs Core i5-10500T
Description
The 5500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500U gets a score of 261.9 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.2 times faster than the 5500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500U gets a score of 261.9 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.2 times faster than the 5500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f81
a0653
Core
Lucienne
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
53.76k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
261.91k points
302.13k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5500U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.63k
25.16k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
23k
22.28k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.62k
5.18k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.51k
11.97k (x1.84)
TOTAL
53.76k
64.6k (x1.2)
Multithread
5500U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
90.38k
144.86k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
118.74k
120.98k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.39k
32.55k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
3.73k (x0.85)
TOTAL
261.91k
302.13k (x1.15)
Performance/W
5500U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
6025 points/W
4139 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7916 points/W
3457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3226 points/W
930 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
294 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
17461 points/W
8632 points/W
Performance/GHz
5500U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3908 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5750 points/GHz
5863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2156 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1628 points/GHz
3151 points/GHz
TOTAL
13441 points/GHz
16999 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4