Ryzen 5 5500U vs Core i5-10210U
Description
The 5500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500U gets a score of 261.9 k points while the i5-10210U gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500U is 1.8 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500U gets a score of 261.9 k points while the i5-10210U gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500U is 1.8 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f81
806ec
Core
Lucienne
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2021
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
53.76k points
56.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
261.91k points
147.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5500U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.63k
22.96k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
23k
20.8k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.62k
4.76k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.51k
7.5k (x1.15)
TOTAL
53.76k
56.03k (x1.04)
Multithread
5500U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
90.38k
66.43k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
118.74k
62.38k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.39k
14.52k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
4.45k (x1.01)
TOTAL
261.91k
147.78k (x0.56)
Performance/W
5500U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
6025 points/W
4429 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7916 points/W
4158 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3226 points/W
968 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
294 points/W
297 points/W
TOTAL
17461 points/W
9852 points/W
Performance/GHz
5500U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
3908 points/GHz
5468 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5750 points/GHz
4953 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2156 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1628 points/GHz
1785 points/GHz
TOTAL
13441 points/GHz
13340 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4