Ryzen 5 5500U vs Core i3-9100
Description
The 5500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-9100 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500U gets a score of 261.9 k points while the i3-9100 gets 229.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500U is 1.1 times faster than the i3-9100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500U gets a score of 261.9 k points while the i3-9100 gets 229.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500U is 1.1 times faster than the i3-9100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f81
906eb
Core
Lucienne
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2021
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
53.76k points
66.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
261.91k points
229.2k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5500U
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
15.63k
28.03k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
23k
24.5k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.62k
5.73k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.51k
8.48k (x1.3)
TOTAL
53.76k
66.74k (x1.24)
Multithread
5500U
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
90.38k
107.5k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
118.74k
95.11k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.39k
22.02k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
4.57k (x1.04)
TOTAL
261.91k
229.2k (x0.88)
Performance/W
5500U
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
6025 points/W
1654 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7916 points/W
1463 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3226 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
294 points/W
70 points/W
TOTAL
17461 points/W
3526 points/W
Performance/GHz
5500U
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
3908 points/GHz
6675 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5750 points/GHz
5833 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2156 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1628 points/GHz
2018 points/GHz
TOTAL
13441 points/GHz
15891 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4