| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5500U vs Core i3-7100


Description
The 5500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500U gets a score of 261.9 k points while the i3-7100 gets 126.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 5500U is 2.1 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f81
906e9
Core
Lucienne
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
15 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2021
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
53.76k points
58.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
261.91k points
126.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5500U
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
15.63k
25.77k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
23k
23.26k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.62k
5.43k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.51k
4.09k (x0.63)
TOTAL
53.76k
58.55k (x1.09)

Multithread

5500U

i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
90.38k
54.98k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
118.74k
54.73k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.39k
13.12k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
3.65k (x0.83)
TOTAL
261.91k
126.47k (x0.48)

Performance/W
5500U
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
6025 points/W
1078 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7916 points/W
1073 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3226 points/W
257 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
294 points/W
72 points/W
TOTAL
17461 points/W
2480 points/W

Performance/GHz
5500U
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
3908 points/GHz
6607 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5750 points/GHz
5964 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2156 points/GHz
1393 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1628 points/GHz
1049 points/GHz
TOTAL
13441 points/GHz
15014 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4