Ryzen 5 5500U vs 3400G
Description
The 5500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500U gets a score of 261.9 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500U is 1.3 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500U gets a score of 261.9 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500U is 1.3 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f81
810f81
Core
Lucienne
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2021
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
53.76k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
261.91k points
200.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5500U
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.63k
14.58k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
23k
23.98k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.62k
5.35k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.51k
6.34k (x0.97)
TOTAL
53.76k
50.25k (x0.93)
Multithread
5500U
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
90.38k
57.37k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
118.74k
107.03k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.39k
28.9k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
7.05k (x1.6)
TOTAL
261.91k
200.34k (x0.76)
Performance/W
5500U
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6025 points/W
883 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7916 points/W
1647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3226 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
294 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
17461 points/W
3082 points/W
Performance/GHz
5500U
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3908 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5750 points/GHz
5710 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2156 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1628 points/GHz
1509 points/GHz
TOTAL
13441 points/GHz
11965 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4