| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5500U vs Core i5-11300H


Description
The 5500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500U gets a score of 261.9 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 1.1 times faster than the 5500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f81
806c1
Core
Lucienne
Tiger Lake H35
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2021
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
53.76k points
63.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
261.91k points
285.75k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5500U
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.63k
25.83k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
23k
23.56k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.62k
9.2k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.51k
5.06k (x0.78)
TOTAL
53.76k
63.64k (x1.18)

Multithread

5500U

i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
90.38k
116.87k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
118.74k
121.08k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.39k
41.8k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
6k (x1.36)
TOTAL
261.91k
285.75k (x1.09)

Performance/W
5500U
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6025 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7916 points/W
3459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3226 points/W
1194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
294 points/W
171 points/W
TOTAL
17461 points/W
8164 points/W

Performance/GHz
5500U
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3908 points/GHz
5870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5750 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2156 points/GHz
2090 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1628 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
TOTAL
13441 points/GHz
14465 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4