Ryzen 5 4600H vs Xeon Silver 4110
Description
The 4600H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 1.2 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 1.2 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
50654
Core
Renoir
Skylake-SP
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
11264 kB
Date
January 2020
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
281.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
18.78k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
16.25k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
3.99k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
6.8k (x0.95)
TOTAL
54.11k
45.82k (x0.85)
Multithread
4600H
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
133.55k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
108.43k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
30.02k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
9.48k (x1.99)
TOTAL
334.72k
281.48k (x0.84)
Performance/W
4600H
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
3311 points/W
Performance/GHz
4600H
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4