| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4600H vs Core i9-10980XE


Description
The 4600H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 3.7 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
50657
Core
Renoir
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
6/12
18/36
TDP
45 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
25344 kB
Date
January 2020
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
1241.12k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
29.53k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
22.59k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
5.99k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
10.22k (x1.42)
TOTAL
54.11k
68.33k (x1.26)

Multithread

4600H

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
587.06k (x4.98)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
496.41k (x3.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
134.66k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
22.99k (x4.82)
TOTAL
334.72k
1241.12k (x3.71)

Performance/W
4600H
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
7522 points/W

Performance/GHz
4600H
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4