Ryzen 5 4600H vs Core i9-10900X
Description
The 4600H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 1.9 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 1.9 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
50657
Core
Renoir
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
6/12
10/20
TDP
45 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
10x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
19712 kB
Date
January 2020
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
62.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
632.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
25.97k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
22.37k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
5.3k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
8.63k (x1.2)
TOTAL
54.11k
62.28k (x1.15)
Multithread
4600H
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
281.98k (x2.39)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
259.01k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
64.87k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
26.5k (x5.55)
TOTAL
334.72k
632.35k (x1.89)
Performance/W
4600H
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
1709 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
1570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
161 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
3832 points/W
Performance/GHz
4600H
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
5526 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
4760 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
1835 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
13250 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4