| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4600H vs Core i7-4500U


Description
The 4600H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-4500U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i7-4500U gets 66.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 4600H is 5.1 times faster than the i7-4500U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
40651
Core
Renoir
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
6/12
2 /2
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2020
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
33.02k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
66.14k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
16.67k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
9k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
3.75k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
3.6k (x0.5)
TOTAL
54.11k
33.02k (x0.61)

Multithread

4600H

i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
31.77k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
21.36k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
7.95k (x0.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
5.06k (x1.06)
TOTAL
334.72k
66.14k (x0.2)

Performance/W
4600H
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
2118 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
1424 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
530 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
338 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
4410 points/W

Performance/GHz
4600H
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
3001 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
1250 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
1199 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
11008 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4