| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4600H vs Core i7-10610U


Description
The 4600H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i7-10610U gets 162 k points.

Summarizing, the 4600H is 2.1 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
806ec
Core
Renoir
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
FCBGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2020
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
56.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
162k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
23.1k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
20k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
4.61k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
8.94k (x1.25)
TOTAL
54.11k
56.65k (x1.05)

Multithread

4600H

i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
73.36k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
68.28k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
13.73k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
6.62k (x1.39)
TOTAL
334.72k
162k (x0.48)

Performance/W
4600H
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
2934 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
2731 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
549 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
6480 points/W

Performance/GHz
4600H
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
4715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
4082 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
940 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
1825 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
11562 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4