| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4600H vs Core i5-9500T


Description
The 4600H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i5-9500T gets 274 k points.

Summarizing, the 4600H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-9500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
906ea
Core
Renoir
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/6
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
9216 kB
Date
January 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
61.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
274.02k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
24.5k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
21.41k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
4.82k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
10.73k (x1.5)
TOTAL
54.11k
61.46k (x1.14)

Multithread

4600H

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
134.63k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
113.61k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
21.71k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
4.07k (x0.85)
TOTAL
334.72k
274.02k (x0.82)

Performance/W
4600H
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
3846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
3246 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
620 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
7829 points/W

Performance/GHz
4600H
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5786 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
2901 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
16610 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4