Ryzen 5 4600H vs Core i5-7200U
Description
The 4600H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i5-7200U gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 3.4 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i5-7200U gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 3.4 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
806e9
Core
Renoir
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2020
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
44.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
97.52k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
19.34k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
17.47k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
4.08k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
4.04k (x0.56)
TOTAL
54.11k
44.94k (x0.83)
Multithread
4600H
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
42.86k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
41.3k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
9.69k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
3.68k (x0.77)
TOTAL
334.72k
97.52k (x0.29)
Performance/W
4600H
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
2857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
2753 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
646 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
245 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
6501 points/W
Performance/GHz
4600H
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
6239 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5637 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
1316 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
14496 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4