| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4600H vs Core i5-10400F


Description
The 4600H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.1 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
a0653
Core
Renoir
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
369.97k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
26.28k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
23.38k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
5.52k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
12.96k (x1.81)
TOTAL
54.11k
68.14k (x1.26)

Multithread

4600H

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
163.67k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
159.74k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
39k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
7.56k (x1.58)
TOTAL
334.72k
369.97k (x1.11)

Performance/W
4600H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
4600H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4